Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

New Classic's


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 hurricane

hurricane

    Member

  • Regulars
  • 734 posts

Posted 02 July 2010 - 09:09 PM

Looks like Barcrest are taking a step back, in a good way though. :)

Posted Image

Posted Image

Edited by hurricane, 02 July 2010 - 09:11 PM.


#2 cashbox1

cashbox1

    The furniture

  • Layout Creator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2553 posts

Posted 02 July 2010 - 10:05 PM

good to see a couple of "old timers" given a new lease of life :D :D

Einstein`s theory of FME 90 downloads = 3 thanks


#3 brucegeorge

brucegeorge

    Layout Disasters

  • Layout Creator
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1710 posts

Posted 02 July 2010 - 10:51 PM

Got 3 close to me I got a £140 top off one so I like lol

#4 CrAzYbAr

CrAzYbAr

    Japan bound

  • Gold Supporters
  • 2640 posts

Posted 02 July 2010 - 11:08 PM

There's a couple in my local over 18s arcade. They're joined together like old Showtime boxes. Never been on them though and most likely never will

This is a site for EMULATION purposes of older machines. Not playing strategies.
If you are more interested in playing modern machines,
visit Jackpottyforums

(DOND is around now on this site..... How long was this sig out of date...!)


#5 todd1970

todd1970

    The furniture

  • Regulars
  • 6818 posts

Posted 03 July 2010 - 11:24 AM

Nice lo-tech's..but i could imagine these taking £150 plus whilst on 'suck mode' before paying out any kind of half decent streak.
Mmmmmm...Sandy ive 'ad her ye know. :)

#6 Guest_Tommy c_*

Guest_Tommy c_*
  • Guests

Posted 03 July 2010 - 12:26 PM

i could imagine these taking £150 plus whilst on 'suck mode' before paying out any kind of half decent streak.

Agreed i could see em taking even more than that,especially if there in bingo halls lol.

#7 Guest_robinhood75_*

Guest_robinhood75_*
  • Guests

Posted 04 July 2010 - 03:00 PM

Agreed i could see em taking even more than that,especially if there in bingo halls lol.



Personally i think arcades are worse than bingo halls, in an arcade you get your pros that will go round all the time winning shed loads which you also get in bingo halls but with bingo i feel there is more people playing than arcades so they get filled faster. Thats the case in gloucester anyways.

#8 Johnny's Amusements

Johnny's Amusements

    Newbie

  • New Members
  • 33 posts

Posted 10 July 2010 - 05:47 PM

Personally i think arcades are worse than bingo halls, in an arcade you get your pros that will go round all the time winning shed loads which you also get in bingo halls but with bingo i feel there is more people playing than arcades so they get filled faster. Thats the case in gloucester anyways.


Problem with some bingo halls is machines set to a low % payout. One of the main reasons behind this is the outrageous smoking ban. Players used to spend their breaks from the bingo playing the machines. Now they all head straight outside for a fag. Result being the machines are played for a far shorter period of time, so some bingo halls try to compensate this by lowering machine % payouts. Bad, I know!
Johnny's Amusements 114 Gorgie Road Edinburgh EH11 2NR

http://www.johnnysamusements.co.uk

#9 Guest_Tommy c_*

Guest_Tommy c_*
  • Guests

Posted 10 July 2010 - 06:02 PM

Well i think there shit percentages either way,84% is ok for an high tech machine but is diabolicol on the low tech machines :policeman: and 84% being the bingo standard it can omly get worse.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users