Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Harry Potter Fruit Machine


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 jamesb99_1999

jamesb99_1999

    Designed Layabout

  • New Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2176 posts

Posted 19 July 2005 - 12:14 PM

Has anybody seen a Harry Potter fruit machine yet?? You seem to get Lord of the rings and Austin Powers etc.. But no Harry Potter.. Do you think J K Rowling is stopping it?? I would bet three Dumbledores what the Jackpot would be..

#2 Dr DX

Dr DX

    Daddy To A Little Angel

  • Layout Creator
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1836 posts

Posted 19 July 2005 - 01:36 PM

does any 1 know when the lord of the rings emu will be done?? it has to be out more than 3 years now?? i would love to do it if i knew how to lol

#3 CoasterDesignerpro

CoasterDesignerpro

    Member

  • New Members
  • PipPip
  • 583 posts

Posted 19 July 2005 - 02:49 PM

The Lord of the rings trilogy runs on Scorpion 4 tech. Unemulateable at present, to emulate you will needs codes etc.

#4 Dr DX

Dr DX

    Daddy To A Little Angel

  • Layout Creator
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1836 posts

Posted 19 July 2005 - 02:57 PM

pity i love that machine won loads from it to at weither spoons bar

#5 skabaz

skabaz

    Engineer of the World

  • New Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2778 posts

Posted 19 July 2005 - 06:31 PM

voodoo games release a machine called jack potter which was a vague harry potter clone.

i think the proper license would cost a fortune.

baz

#6 CoasterDesignerpro

CoasterDesignerpro

    Member

  • New Members
  • PipPip
  • 583 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 06:11 PM

How did Bell fruit get the licence for the Lord Of the rings machines then, surely the licence for these three machines are just as expensive as a Harry Potter licence would cost, as it is almost as popular.

#7 Bencrest

Bencrest

    The furniture

  • New Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7446 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 06:15 PM

I don't think people like Barcrest want to waste money on licensing.

I mean, BFM got the licensed art & sound for Bullseye, and thats great if you want another bloody Grand Blaster Cash clone.

Barcrest tend to narrowly avoid licensing, like their new 'obviously Space Invaders' machine, which is called something close to Space Invaders, but which will cost them nothing at all.
Ben
 
Hopefully recovering from years of compulsive gambling and wanting to be gamble free forever.
 
Recommended reading - http://www.gamblersaloud.com/ (yes, I bought the book, very happy with it!)

#8 skabaz

skabaz

    Engineer of the World

  • New Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2778 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 06:16 PM

they probably paid loads for it but there are only so many licenses companies can buy due to the expence.

i would assume the harry potter license would be one of the most expensive lisences out there.

barcrest paid an absolute mint for the 1 year elvis license.

baz

#9 Bencrest

Bencrest

    The furniture

  • New Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7446 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 06:21 PM

I think BFM only do it because they produce rushed licensed machines with half-hearted attempts at artwork.

Just look at LOTR - FOTR and Snake Rattle and Roll. I think SR & R was a FAR better looking machine, the sounds on LOTR were pretty awful IMHO, and the art looked like it took about 5 seconds... same with stuff like I'm A Celebrity.

Mind you, can't fault their Monopoly machine, never thought BFM could make a professional looking machine. I bet they showed about 100 varients of the art to Hasbro before they let them use it. A company like Hasbro won't have their name cheapened by a shite machine :)
Ben
 
Hopefully recovering from years of compulsive gambling and wanting to be gamble free forever.
 
Recommended reading - http://www.gamblersaloud.com/ (yes, I bought the book, very happy with it!)

#10 pash

pash

    Old fart

  • Regulars
  • 440 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 07:53 PM

you would also get loads of parents complaining saying it was encouraging their children to gamble as theoretically harry potter is more for children than the over 18`s that are meant to be playing fruities
Pash - Fruit-emu moderator

#11 djgaryc

djgaryc

    Member

  • New Members
  • Pip
  • 295 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 07:59 PM

you would also get loads of parents complaining saying it was encouraging their children to gamble as theoretically harry potter is more for children than the over 18`s that are meant to be playing fruities

Yeah... Top shout. But how about The Simpsons and games like that. The Simpsons are cartoon bassed which younger ones like, It could be argued it is for adults too... But plenty of adults like the Harry Pothead stuff.

Okey Dokey ROLL 'EM


#12 jamesb99_1999

jamesb99_1999

    Designed Layabout

  • New Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2176 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 08:44 PM

I read today that J K Rowling won't let them publish ebooks or audio books on line of Harry Potter - so that might explain it, she was a hippy at one time wasn't she.. So probably totally against Fruitys and won't let them make one... Kids can play fruit machines in all service stations and most seaside arcades as long as they are £5 jackpot or below..
J<br /><br /><br /><br />A man

#13 dtrmad2004

dtrmad2004

    Total

  • New Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1485 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 08:47 PM

lol harry pothead look at this http://www.newground...arrypotter.html

Andy
<a class='bbc_url' href='<a class='bbc_url' href='http://profile.mygam...trmad2004'></a>Posted Image</a><br /><br />Don't gamble with the Recession!

#14 Jamesbond_007838

Jamesbond_007838

    Option Explicit

  • New Members
  • Pip
  • 348 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 09:36 PM

I read today that J K Rowling won't let them publish ebooks or audio books on line of Harry Potter


Yeah she might not "let" them but it happens anyway :D Ive got the latest book here somewhere as a PDF.........

#15 bennie22

bennie22

    Junior Member

  • New Members
  • 34 posts

Posted 21 July 2005 - 10:13 PM

[QUOTE=jamesb99_1999] So probably totally against Fruitys and won't let them make one...

You mean not everyone like fruit machines!! Damn!

I'm amazed there was a Doctor Who machine years back!

#16 CrAzYbAr

CrAzYbAr

    Japan bound

  • Gold Supporters
  • 2640 posts

Posted 22 July 2005 - 11:54 AM

I think BFM only do it because they produce rushed licensed machines with half-hearted attempts at artwork.

I think so too!

I just :mad: HATE :mad: those HUGE lapper boards that take the whole machine up, like on Pony Express. Have they ever heard of ORGANISING the layout so it does not look like meal of the day in a school cafeteria?? :eek:

This is a site for EMULATION purposes of older machines. Not playing strategies.
If you are more interested in playing modern machines,
visit Jackpottyforums

(DOND is around now on this site..... How long was this sig out of date...!)


#17 Bencrest

Bencrest

    The furniture

  • New Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7446 posts

Posted 22 July 2005 - 03:15 PM

Y'know, you've just named a machine I hate the design of.

BFM -

Change the goddamn font between machines. At least make it look like you have simply cut the board and trails from one machine and plonked them onto new artwork.

Also, Pony Express has no visible background art, which is a disappointment.
Ben
 
Hopefully recovering from years of compulsive gambling and wanting to be gamble free forever.
 
Recommended reading - http://www.gamblersaloud.com/ (yes, I bought the book, very happy with it!)

#18 CrAzYbAr

CrAzYbAr

    Japan bound

  • Gold Supporters
  • 2640 posts

Posted 22 July 2005 - 03:40 PM

What I would have is a nice square lapper at the bottom and the disk above it.
All the columns would be either side of the lapper.
There would be a nice cowboy scene in the background!

What do u think?

This is a site for EMULATION purposes of older machines. Not playing strategies.
If you are more interested in playing modern machines,
visit Jackpottyforums

(DOND is around now on this site..... How long was this sig out of date...!)





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users