Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Decide the future of FME. Project Amber.


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#21 spa

spa

    Layout Designer

  • Moderators
  • 2494 posts

Posted 29 January 2014 - 09:28 PM

Option 1 seems to be the best option but from what you and killcrazy are hinting, would it be worth it? Depending on how you two go about things?


http://www.youtube.com/FruitVideos - My youtube channel

 

https://drive.google...R3ZTMTBIQTdwWUU- My Drive

 

 

 

 

 


#22 richy1976

richy1976

    The furniture

  • Regulars
  • 2601 posts

Donator

Posted 30 January 2014 - 12:12 AM

Would love to see mpu4 video.

I have 3 machines for resources.



#23 Guitar

Guitar

    Project Amber Developer

  • Layout Creator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2989 posts

Posted 01 February 2014 - 02:04 PM

Well the decision appears to be simple. Option 1 it is.

 

I am due to chat with Killcrazy on Monday to start getting up to speed with his emulator and working out the direction we are headed.

 

In the mean time I have an intermediate plan to write a tech in a dll, mixing the speed of C++ with the front end of Amber. Once I am fully up to speed with Killcrazy's emu (needs a name), and it is ready for release, adding the tech to his emu should be a doddle, simply implement the dll calls.

 

This should allow me to progress Amber until the other emulator is ready, at which point Amber will be discontinued. I have been really enjoying the online functionality of amber, so keeping it going until there is a replacement seems a good idea.

 

MPU4 will be the first tech to be transported, though it will be entirely written from scratch, with a view to the future for adding MPU4-Video and Plasma tech. As MPU4 is the oldest tech in Amber, it was written before I fully understood the nuances of emulation and will really benefit from a rewrite.


Project Amber 2 - Coming Soon





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users